//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Researcher in mathematical optimization at Inria Grenoble, caffeine-fueled computational scientist and open-source developer
Mathieu Besançon









Loading...
And yes, this is brought to you by maxflow
4mo
Mathieu Besançon
For people speaking languages with a distinction of formal and informal "you", are you also looking up through piles of emails to see if you're on an informal basis with someone?
I'll be at the jump.dev workshop and SIAM OP26 in Edinburgh! Come say hi to chat on computational optimization, constrained first-order methods, or hunt down the best specialty coffee and bouldering gyms in town!
13d
<academic rant> I am always amazed and annoyed at the same time that there is a research field of "algorithms" in which you need to spend an enormous amount of time to understand if any new method has a slim chance of ever being run
14d
4mo
Don't get me wrong I have nothing against doing that theoretical upper bound research. The drama is that I struggle to find real improvements to maxflow (or more generally flow?) algorithms that came from this theoretical progress. Isn't that one role that theoretical algorithmic should fill?
Les Grenoblois quand les Lyonnais viennent en rando en chaussures bateau et chino
Yeah sure AGI but when will train platforms apply reduction cards correctly on a trip?