//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Brian Waismeyer
former Trust & Safety researcher and data scientist (Facebook, pre-Musk Twitter). not sure social media should exist, but it does, so I tried to help it be better. grateful to be doing more joyful data work at Wizards these days. =) 30+ | he / him | WA








Loading...
and when does it sometimes work kinda ok? when it's used by experts on their area of expertise... esp if the use is focused on (relatively) structured and context-insensitive inputs (eg, code)... and esp if developers of AI tend to be familiar with or sensitive to those use cases (eg, CODE).
and it is presented confidently to a general audience, with fig leaves for attempts to educate and convey limits (at best, usually just enough to limit liability; at worst, marketing to make AI seem like more than it is).
I'll take this a step further: most of the AI proponents I see - especially with social platforms - don't understand the methods, theories, debates, and philosophies of machine learning either (aka - the three raccoons raccoons tech companies are shoving into a trenchcoat and calling AI).