//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
A newsletter dedicated to reforming the practice of science through rigorous debate. Metascience | open science | statistics Subscribe at redteamofscience.com
Red Team of Science









Loading...
A poll finds that priming research might be bad enough to save science. #metasci www.redteamofscience.com/p/the-missin...
Rachel Aviv reviewed four decades’ worth of Oliver Sack’s journals—many of which had never been read before. What she found reveals how the neurologist’s own stories shaped the ones he told about his patients.
At least @physicsworld.bsky.social admits to using nonsense from the literature. YouTube "warriors for science" don't need to. #metasci www.redteamofscience.com/p/one-of-the...
Misconduct sleuth wins $2.63 million from major cancer institute in $15 million settlement | Science | AAAS www.science.org/content/arti...
3mo
Among the references: Bik: The dark side of post-publication peer review. Ioannidis: A new era of hyper-skepticism in science. A former COPE council member apparently thought these were 1. not suspicious and 2. didn't click the links.
Koroshetz was adamant about improving science but his project to get schools to teach rigor has had mixed results. www.redteamofscience.com/p/nih-encour... www.science.org/content/arti...
New data: Most psychologists believe crisis persists despite significant progress. Yet evidence suggests there's still an advantage to bending the rules. #metasci www.redteamofscience.com/p/psychologi...
6mo
Scientific sleuthing: a better evening in than watching Netflix? #ResearchIntegrity #Science #WCRI2026 #WCRI www.timeshighereducation.com/depth/scient...
6mo
6mo
Congratulations to @simine.com for winning the Einstein Foundation Individual Award! 🎉 A well-deserved recognition for her seminal efforts to improve scientific rigor, which includes instituting detailed checks for errors and computational reproducibility at Psychological Science.
A poll finds that priming research might be bad enough to save science
www.redteamofscience.com
The missing link
7mo
5mo
6mo
5mo
In case you have missed Simine Vazire's excellent webinar yesterday, here is the link to watch it online: youtu.be/_vb1CNwC3CM Thanks again @simine.com for staying up so late and thanks to the audience for the great questions!
6mo
Red Team of Science
6mo
The New Yorker
Red Team of Science
Charles Piller
Red Team of Science
Red Team of Science
Red Team of Science
World Conferences on Research Integrity
ERROR
Peer Community In
The scientist was famous for linking healing with storytelling. Sometimes that meant reshaping patients’ reality.
www.newyorker.com
Scientific sleuthing: a better evening in than watching Netflix?
Oliver Sacks Put Himself Into His Case Studies. What Was the Cost?
The £2 million recently awarded to a whistleblower by a US court is a rare reward for the volunteers who trawl the scientific literature for error and fraud. Yet their numbers continue to grow. So wha...
www.timeshighereducation.com
www.redteamofscience.com
Results from a new poll
Psychologists think there's a crisis in psychology
It's only getting more popular
One of the most dangerous ideas in science was a misunderstanding
www.redteamofscience.com
youtu.be
PCI Webinar series #13 - Simine Vazire - Recognizing and responding to a replication crisis
Trump administration declines to renew appointment of Walter Koroshetz, against NIH director’s wishes
www.science.org
Firing of neuroscience institute chief adds to NIH’s leadership vacuum
Data detectives see validation in deal with U.S. government that penalizes Dana-Farber Cancer Institute for misrepresenting data in NIH grant applications
Misconduct sleuth wins $2.63 million from major cancer institute in $15 million settlement
www.science.org