//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
As SCOTUS prepares to hear arguments Wed. 4/1 in Trump v. Barbara, a new op-ed co-written by Northwestern historian Kate Masur revisits what the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause meant to those who wrote it — and how that history may inform the Court's decision. ⚖️
2mo
Weinberg College of Arts & Sciences
“From the start, birthright citizenship was understood as a vehicle by which ‘all persons’ born” in the United States, write Martha S. Jones and Kate Masur, “would become full members of a newly remade democracy.”
2mo
nyti.ms
The framers of the 14th Amendment endorsed a capacious definition of ‘American.’
Opinion | Trump Says Birthright Citizenship Was for ‘the Babies of Slaves.’ He’s Wrong.
New York Times Opinion