//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...









Loading...
How about reviewers get paid for their time reviewing manuscripts? Most journals enjoy fat margins that go to their shareholders.
1mo
Juan Martin Serrano
Is Trump resurrecting Jeffrey Epstein?
1mo
The ESCRT machinery mediates repair of damaged lysosomal membranes. But how does it recognise damage? Authors @nature report LASER, a fast-forming protein assembly that detects Ca2+-leakage from sites of lysosomal injury and recruits ESCRTs there. shorturl.at/T9zM6
7d
Katie Phang
LASER couples damage sensing to ESCRT assembly for lysosome repair - Nature
shorturl.at
ATG8 conjugation on damaged lysosomes triggers rapid assembly of a protein complex containing TFG, which directs lysosomal membrane repair by recruiting ESCRT proteins to sites of damage.
Sadaf Shadan
We are hiring a PDRA in AI at @kingscollegelondon.bsky.social to join CARE-AFRICA an @globalhealthedctp3.bsky.social EU-funded project building an AI clinical decision-support tool to tackle diarrhoeal disease & AMR in children under 5 across sub-Saharan Africa. #AI #GlobalHealth #AMR 👇
27d
most journals have fat profits, they can definitely afford to pay those who do an essential part of their business
It’s pretty weird to take an extra deep breath because the president didn’t order our military to commit horrific atrocities and to then think “well f*ck, I’m pretty sure my country deserves some serious sanctions and whatnot for what our government is up to”
These are very sad news. Bridget made a lasting difference to young scientists in the UK by launching the Lister Prize Fellowship scheme
6d
2mo
1mo
Very proud that Spain is leading the way. UK must speed up the transition to renewable energy.
Just like Poop Cruise in Netflix, you couldn't make this up www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
Juan Martin Serrano
2mo
Juan Martin Serrano
2mo
Tania Dottorini
Juan Martin Serrano
Melissa Kane PhD
Juan Martin Serrano
Biology Open is published by the nonprofit @biologists.bsky.social so if they can pay reviewers…
Opinion piece: The peer review process and peer reviewers are severely strained. We propose a transparent universal credit system to incentivize #PeerReview. In PNAS Front Matter: https://ow.ly/6Ahb50YWblR #SciencePublishing #AcademicPublishing #ResearchEnterprise
6d
1mo
most journals have fat profits, they can definitely afford to pay those who do an essential part of their business
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
6d
Juan Martin Serrano
1mo
The Lister Institute is deeply saddened by the passing of Dame Bridget Ogilvie, distinguished parasitologist and science leader. She helped secure the Institute's future by shaping the current, highly prestigious #ListerPrize awards. Our tribute 👉 lister-institute.org.uk/news/in-memo...
Aircraft carrier has been participating in strikes on Iran, after previously taking part in the operation to seize Venezuela’s president Nicolás Maduro
www.theguardian.com
Fire damage, clogged toilets, and sinking morale: USS Gerald R Ford to set sail for repairs in Crete
Daniel Gorelick
The Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine
Paying peer reviewers works. Expanded Fast & Fair experiment @biologyopen.bsky.social: • 5.5 vs 37.7 working days to decision with reviews • ~3 vs ~9 reviewer invitations per manuscript • no reduction in editor-assessed review quality • similar acceptance rates www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
Paying peer reviewers works. Expanded Fast & Fair experiment @biologyopen.bsky.social: • 5.5 vs 37.7 working days to decision with reviews • ~3 vs ~9 reviewer invitations per manuscript • no reduction in editor-assessed review quality • similar acceptance rates www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
7d
7d