Resurrecting thread with new wrinkle - what to do when you suspect reviewers used AI to review your MS, you can't prove so just push back on (generic, oddly phrased) critique with rebuttal and the AE rejects appeal with text that is a generic, oddly phrased version of the original decision 😵💫 🧪
A reviewer just very clearly used AI to write a review. What do I do (as an author)?