//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Slava Ukraini! Слава Україні!
Telibarb 🐾
Loading...
Really important win for journalism but it’s the last paragraph that really struck me Palantir has to pay 95% of the Swiss magazine’s costs - which are $11,000 A case like this in the U.K. would cost *millions* in legal fees. Why it’s so easy for rich to suppress criticism
8h
Peter Geoghegan
A police officer did what??! news.sky.com/story/derbys...
Palantir loses legal challenge against Swiss investigative magazine ft.trib.al/TS7SOJp
55m
Had my ears dewaxed, my fallen arch inserts adjusted and my glasses straightened so far today. All for sixty quid. Gentlemen we can rebuild him. I’m like the middle aged six million dollar man. The sixty quid man.
1d