Texas A&M Law Review 13:2 (2026) is a symposium issue on constitutional interpretation with many contributions of interest to legal historians:
Constitutional Interpretation as Problem Solving: How the Modalities Work
Jack M. Balkin
Originalist Arguments in Free Speech History
Samantha Barbas
Race, Memory, and Authority in Constitutional Interpretation
Henry L. Chambers, Jr.
Memory Warriors, Pluralists, and Abnegators in Constitutional Interpretation: An Essay on Jack Balkin's Pluralist Originalism in Memory and Authority
Jed Handelsman Shugerman and Zachary Shugerman Handelsman
Balkin Amid Balkanization: Constitutional Construction, the Uses of History, and Interpretive Discretion in a Divided Country
Neil S. Siegel
Memory and Authority of Failed Constitutional Amendments
Julie C. Suk
Historical Methods of Constitutional Interpretation and Political Gradations
Nelson Tebbe
Roger Taney, Memory Entrepreneur
Anne Twitty
Hermeneutics in History
John Fabian Witt
Remarks: Why Constitutional Argument Matters
Philip Bobbitt
--Dan ErnstÂ
