//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
As I predicted, Judge Pitts issues the safe and correct opinion--that the Stanford hospital is not a state actor. Now, perhaps, Stanford can work to challenge the subpoena (esp. on nonconstitutional grounds) in Fort Worth ... and eventually, in the SCOTUS. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
3d
Order on Administrative Motion per Civil Local Rule 7-11 AND Order on Motion for TRO
storage.courtlistener.com
Order on Administrative Motion per Civil Local Rule 7-11 AND Order on Motion for TRO – #40 in Z.A. v. Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford (N.D. Cal., 5:26-cv-04998) – CourtListener.c...
Marty Lederman