free cycle | community garden | food not bombs | Brisbane | she/her |🤘
Personal account for local community activities. If you’re looking for my science stuff, see @nadiah.bsky.social
Nadiah
Loading...
Writing for an anarchist blog, for example, counts as evidence and participation in the conspiracy.
Rather, the argument is that those 15 are part of a *conspiracy* to violently oppose the state. That way, their perfectly legal and even constitutionally protected actions can be reframed as actions towards an illegal goal and thus criminalised.
My husband, who uses a Mac *spit*, just informed me that Macs don't have a "terminal" key.
That makes more sense, in retrospect.
I admit I did laugh a bit but everyone in that thread is being so sweet and helpful to each other even though they’re confused ☺️
lol cute
This reminds me of that old joke about creating a Linux virus and hoping someone downloads and extracts the tarball and then types “sudo make install”
I found this article really helpful to understand the kind of legal reasoning the US government is using to go after its domestic political opponents 🧵
Of course, it’s not illegal to be an anarchist in the US. Technically, they still have freedom of political belief. But it makes sense the Trump administration would go after those citizens whose political beliefs centre an opposition to fascism.
The 15 Minnesotans aren’t actually charged with doing any violence, let alone “domestic terrorism”.
