//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...








Loading...
t is our pleasure to invite you to the #MEN4DEM Roundtable: Art, Science, and Social Change, a panel discussion that brings together artists, researchers, and civil-society practitioners to explore how creative practice and academic inquiry can move beyond knowledge production into social action.
Study 3 (US, pre-2024 election): Across Trump & Harris supporters: 👉 Significance gain & self-expansion predicted action 👉 Significance loss weaker 💡 Across divides: positive > negative — with a twist 💡 Effects hold controlling for identity, anger & efficacy.
Not just anger. Across 3 studies (N>950, 🇵🇱🇺🇸), feeling significant and growing in a group predicted collective action better than negative emotions—even beyond identity, injustice & efficacy. 👉 Action is fueled by meaning, not only outrage. #CollectiveAction #socialpsyc Read: doi.org/10.1111/jopy...
With a lead by @Magdalena Zawisza @Natasza Kosakowska-Berezecka, we tested ambivalent sexism theory tenets and explored novel correlations with national outcomes in 62 nations. #sexism #gender #socialpsyc #cross-cultural Read: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
For example: In Study 1, pre-election in Poland 👉 Significance gain strongly predicted collective action (r=.49) 👉 Self-expansion also positive 👉 Significance loss much weaker (r=.19) 💡 Positive experiences > negative emotions in driving action. #Psychology #CollectiveAction
Our study in 58 countries: support for intergroup violence is not a single mindset, but we can identify two distinct forms of extremism: defensive & offensive. Result of the @ncn.gov.pl project led by me & article led by @kunstjonas.bsky.social More in #PNAS www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/... #psychology
1mo
2mo
2mo
2mo
2mo
2mo
MEN4DEM’s LARP tryouts, developed by @via-berlin.bsky.social, are on tour across Europe! Swipe right to see some photos from the fifth stop in Berlin, Germany 🇩🇪➡️
Join us in Gdansk next month for a thought-provoking roundtable discussion exploring how art, science, and civic engagement can work together to inspire meaningful social change. This event is open to the public! Sign up today, link below: forms.office.com/pages/respon...
Online hostility is predicted by economic & political inequality Inequality breeds online hostility because people crave status in unequal societies and status-seekers constitute the main perpetrators of hostility in political settings, whether online or offline. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
2mo
Evolutionary theory and historical evidence suggest humans possess distinct psychological tendencies for defensive and offensive violence, which ha...
www.pnas.org
The psychology of offensive and defensive intergroup violence: Preregistered insights from 58 countries | PNAS
1mo
2mo
Jay Van Bavel, PhD