There's a contradiction in this kind of assumption that we often hear in introductory gen-ed literature courses: When we analyze a text, we're "overthinking." So, it's both quite easy and, at the same time, overcomplicated.
Feels like a lot of STEM guys believed coding was the hardest thing a human could do, and assumed that once somebody invented an AI that can code, it would follow naturally that the AI can do all of the lesser non-coding things that other dumber people were doing