//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...








Loading...
@SarahPhilo357 on X née twitter. Postdoc studying potable water reuse and public health; all views my own. Posting mostly about sports and science. BS at ND '16, MS at Duke '18, PhD at U Washington '23
Sarah Philo
This is bad. Bad for researchers. Bad for science. Bad for universities. Bad for professional associations. For example: 1. Every award would be vetted by political appointees, who could overrule peer reviewers and deny the award if it doesn't advance the president's priorities. 1/🧵
Me if I was a Spurs fan right now:
just a relentless, laser-focused commitment to destroying everything that actually does make this country great
I've had tenured faculty tell me, a postdoc whose app't ends 6-30 w/ no job lined up, the academic market can't get worse. There's no realization how bad it could get, I think, b/c we're in the beginning of cuts. Once they apply for new grants/extensions, they might realize what we're facing.
Does anyone know someone who is knowledgeable about US deregulation of cancer-causing substances, and how this could lead to more cancer cases? It’s for a comic.