//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...





🧠 We found that activity in the LATL tracks whether a determiner expresses a referential domain — that is, how a set of individuals is mentally represented — rather than a simple logical intersection of sets.
5mo
Quantifiers are everywhere in language — but understanding how the brain builds their meaning has been difficult because their interpretation depends on entire sentence contexts. These aren’t just words — they shape meaning structures.
We used MEG with rapid parallel visual presentation of quantified sentences (e.g., “all cats are nice” vs. “some cats are nice”) to isolate brain signals linked to quantifier processing.
5mo
🚀 New paper out now in Cognition! In it, we show how the left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) contributes to interpreting quantifiers like all, some, and no during language comprehension. doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106403
This suggests that the brain represents aspects of quantifier meaning that are not explicitly represented in canonical theories of quantifier semantics.
Our results link neural mechanisms to semantic theories of quantification (like Restricted Quantification). This helps bridge formal linguistics and neurobiology of language.
5mo
5mo
5mo
5mo
Nigel Flower
Nigel Flower
doi.org
Redirecting
Nigel Flower
Nigel Flower
Nigel Flower
Nigel Flower