//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
A one year ban followed by the requirement that subsequent bioXiv submissions must be first accepted by a reputable journal. Does that mean bioXiv finally sees value in peer review 🫢
29d
Andreas Bäumler
wow — the preprint host, arxiv, is banning authors for a year if they submit papers with hallucinated citations 🤖
1mo
anil oza
I find this unsettling: A new study in #Lancet shows that the number of faux citations in scientific articles is on the rise, and #AI is likely to blame. @aniloza.bsky.social reports. www.statnews.com/2026/05/07/l...
1mo
“Fabricated” citations that do not reference real academic papers are spreading in the literature, polluting the public record of science, a new study found
www.statnews.com
Fraudulent citations, blamed on AI hallucinations, are becoming more common in research papers
Helen Branswell 🇨🇦