//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
If you've see your words screenshotted here, it probably means you brought up a very, very bad take on the Fairness Doctrine or other FCC regulation you didn't understand. Repost = good take. Screenshot = bad take
Savoir FairnessDoctrine








Loading...
"Are you serious" = "Oops, I got in over my head here and this person probably knows way more than I do!"
She should have complied!! The driver feared for his life! She was inciting violence! Am I doing it right, MAGAts? (Yes, the 1st line was 100% sarcasm)
Yup.
Ajay has been schooled numerous times about how the Fairness Doctrine actually worked. Ajay doesn't care, and proves it by blowing off PinkTweets' explanation Tell me again how "if FoxNews had to air the truth, there would be no MAGA" is a realistic take when the nation is full of ppl like this.
(And hoax =/= fairness doctrine, but that's what Ajay was rambling about when Pink first commented)
a2run has DEFINITELY read the text of the policy. No doubt about it.
This again.
Yes, because defining a lie is exactly the same as demonstrating a tangible loss.