//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...









Loading...
🧪This is history in the making. On this day last year, @jenna-m-norton.bsky.social et al. penned the #BethesdaDeclaration criticizing the politicization of the #NIH. Cancer research grants supporting clinical trials were terminated, halting clinical trials. Fewer grants were funded.🧪
11h
We published an article written by a number of current and former peer review workers in their personal capacities outlining the changes to peer review at the NIH over the last 18 months. It’s a great resource, and we’re grateful to the authors who wrote it! open.substack.com/pub/27unihte...
2d
Princess Vimentin PhD | Cancer Biologist
Authored by anonymous current and former NIH workers with experience in peer review, this is an overview of all the changes to NIH's peer review over the last 18 months.
open.substack.com
The Quiet Attack On Science: Subverting NIH Peer Review
3/ Censorship and silence IS partisan. It allows continuation of the status quo (the destruction of NIH) and aids those currently in power (a particular political party). "Silence in the face of injustice is complicity with the oppressor."
The brave @sekahn.bsky.social removed from the ADA for distributed a publisehd op-ed critical of the admin is here on Bluesky. Give him a follow.
27 UNIHTED
2/ Distributing a published editorial about how current NIH policy is harming science is not partisan. It is honest. And this honesty matters deeply to people living with diabetes who will be robbed of future treatments and cures if these policies continue.
4/ ADA's statement abdicates its responsibility to its members & beneficiaries, who will suffer from its silence. ADA may continue to exist a little longer because it chose silence & censorship. But its mission to end diabetes through research & "bold advocacy" is dying of self-inflicted wounds.
Worth a read. Many have taken note of the growing solidarity in the science community in opposition to the OMB proposed rule. But this must be just the start. For an example, we can look to @sekahn.bsky.social, Justin Ryder & co who spoke up at ADA and were removed for it. 🧵
9h
We can look to the ADA leaders Jennifer Green & Mark Atkinson who resigned with integrity in protest. We can look to voices that have grown louder more recently @holdenthorp.bsky.social @elizabethginexi.bsky.social
10h
9h
9h
We can look to the "seething"😉 scientists, loud from the start: @27unihted.bsky.social @standupforscience.net @markhisted.org @princess-vimentin.bsky.social @tyk314.net @cdelawalla.bsky.social @gretchentg.bsky.social And we can look to those who literally wrote the book: @timothysnyder.bsky.social
10h
10h
A disappointing statement from the Am Diabetes Assn on @sekahn.bsky.social & co. diabetes.org/newsroom/pre... "As a 501(c)(3) organization, the ADA has safeguards in place to ensure that it complies with all IRS regulations. This includes maintaining a strictly nonpartisan environment..." 🧵1/4
10h
9h
Jenna Norton
Jenna Norton
Jenna Norton
Jenna Norton
Jenna Norton
Jenna Norton
Jenna Norton
This just out in Diabetes Care. The need to highlight the destructive plans of the administration continues. Everyone needs to post comments to the OMB website. Relevant links in the article. Don’t delay!! diabetesjournals.org/care/article...
Jenna Norton
1d
Steven Kahn