Director of Pangloss Consulting for all your AI and GDPR needs! Emerita Prof Newcastle Law School: Hon Prof, @CREATe Glasgow Uni. Formerly @ATI, @SCRIPT: Trying not to be a grey skies thinker & use this place more , [email protected]
Lilian Edwards
Loading...
This is also the time when the English courts desperately need a chance to update / overrule Metropolitan v as de facto precedent for genAI liability
Be good to know what plans ICO has to do something about this?
( Incidentally is it true that ICO has no presence on BlueSky?)
Frankly you can see why a quarter of teenagers would rather stay in with CharGPT than go out when you look yourself up - you had me at "prominent law professor" 😂
This is a fire that Governments are very much going to regret fanning. They may think they can turn the resulting public outrage to their own advantage. They can't. They weren't able to stop the fire from being lit: they certainly won't be able to control the billionaire-funded populists.
This is indeed a landmark win &yet barely a squawk inUK mainstream media obsessed with magic tech beans
Sorry to keep harping on abput this but it is so exactly what I have been saying for 3 yrs that it stops me feeling slightly crazy all the time
“When the AI Overview generates answers, Google is no longer a neutral intermediary of information. Statements are generated using the company's AI technology, and therefore Google, as the operator, is liable”
www.computerbase.de/news/wirtsch...