//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Brain imaging, machine learning, neuroscience, mental disorders https://sites.google.com/view/yeolab
Thomas Yeo


Loading...
🎉 Registration is now OPEN for the 2026 OHBM Australian Chapter Annual Meeting! 🇦🇺🧠🇦🇺 Get your ticket now! 🎟️🎟️🎟️ Registration: events.humanitix.com/ohbm-austral... 📝 Submit your abstract: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F... 🏆 Nominate a colleague (or yourself) for an award: ohbm-aus.github.io/awards/
2d
Uniting the Australian human brain mapping community.
events.humanitix.com
OHBM Australia Meeting 2026
OHBM Australia
You're not going to want to miss this! More information on the Brainhack and other workshops here: ohbm.github.io/hackathon2026/
14d
For those who are attending @ohbmofficial.bsky.social brainhack, I will be giving a short presentation of this work at the neuroimaging statistics workshop, co-hosted with brainhack: sites.google.com/view/nsw2026
17d
OHBM Open Science Special Interest Group
Thomas Yeo
sites.google.com
NeuroStats2026
Join us in Bordeaux, France for OHBM Brainhack 2026, a 3-day collaborative event for building, learning, and connecting around open neuroimaging tools.
ohbm.github.io
OHBM Brainhack Bordeaux 2026 | June 11-13
For those who are attending @ohbmofficial.bsky.social brainhack, I will be giving a short presentation of this work at the neuroimaging statistics workshop, co-hosted with brainhack: sites.google.com/view/nsw2026
17d
In a meta-analysis of 210 biomedical AI studies that statistically compared models under cross-validation, 97% used invalid statistical tests. Here's our new preprint doi.org/10.64898/202... led by @tianchu.bsky.social @hetuli.bsky.social @shaoshiz.bsky.social @nichols.bsky.social 1/N
21d
sites.google.com
Thomas Yeo
NeuroStats2026
Thomas Yeo
In a meta-analysis of 210 biomedical AI studies that statistically compared models under cross-validation, 97% used invalid statistical tests. Here's our new preprint doi.org/10.64898/202... led by @tianchu.bsky.social @hetuli.bsky.social @shaoshiz.bsky.social @nichols.bsky.social 1/N
21d
Thomas Yeo