//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
"media/political elite addiction to Twitter is shaping their views, which in turn shape millions of people. a total reality-warper." "typical Harper's letter signatory's Twitter *still* 80% complaints about the "woke left" even in midst of greatest government crack-down on free speech in 60 years."
18h
NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors and white men
"everybody who stayed has had their brain fully cooked. you see it in a million ways. they casually joke around with race science. they don't even flinch at nazis in their timeline they're steeping in pure hate and can *never* escape seeing Musk propaganda." @anildash.com Elite on Musk Twitter/X:
2mo
NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors and white men
"typical Harper's letter signatory's Twitter *still* 80% complaints about the "woke left" even in midst of greatest government crack-down on free speech in at least 60 years. donor/patron-driven" Why "heterodox" mediocre "meritocracy" men pretend to care about "cancel culture" of "dangerous ideas":
2mo
NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors and white men
"their careers are based on their appeal to Andrew Sullivan and editors of the Atlantic, official publication of the donor class look at Conor Friedersdorf or Thomas Chatterton Williams look at Bari Weiss And that's who all the "free speech" culture stuff is aimed at" And NYT Sulzberger and WaPo
4mo
NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors and white men
(1/X) Check out a typical Harper's letter signatory's Twitter feed and you'll mostly *still* find 80% complaints about the "woke left", even in the midst of the greatest government crack-down on free speech in at least 60 tears. Why? Because the "free speech" movement is donor/patron-driven.
7mo