//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Seismologist, investigates the Andes and subduction zones, currently complexly affiliated with St. Louis University and looking for new projects. Replies to my geoscience posts that include LLM content get your account blocked.
Brandon Bishop









Loading...
You know, considering a whole range of geodynamic models call for melt just above the 410 km discontinuity in the mantle to freeze if they're pulled a bit deeper, there are very few studies of wadsleyite's wet solidus temperature.
And it's not like experimental petrologists don't do things with water and wadsleyite anyway--they do measure how much can go into it at different temperatures at greater than 410 km discontinuity pressures. They just don't focus on determining the solidus temperature.
Not going to solidify to anything of it's the same as a olivine's just above the 410 km discontinuity. Lots of stuff just build on a 2007 statement of "we assume the temperature of the eutectic for wadsleyite is higher than that of basalt's." 🤔
There's a surprisingly effective Republican playbook that's hard to unsee once you see it: 1) Enshittify a government service. Add red tape, means-testing, etc. to make it slower, costlier, more annoying for participants. 2) Use its shittiness to justify gutting or privatizing the service.