//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Political scientist jacksantucci.com
Jack Santucci









Loading...
I have an idea for a solution that can be discussed offline.
Some will object that a larger chamber increases the transaction costs of majority formation. There is no free lunch.
www.voteguy.com/2026/06/09/o...
Fun toy
This podcast with @gelliottmorris.com gives an example of why I called my book “More Parties or No Parties.” The audience for the title was academic. substack.com/app-link/pos...
Ars gratia artis
This piece goes nicely with yesterday’s on the NYC charter commission and recent first-round election in Los Angeles. I add to the conversation by asking whether council/chamber expansion should be on the table. www.voteguy.com/2026/06/10/d...
1d
38m
1d
13h
2h
17h
The Los Angeles result prompted me to write the piece below, alongside a new piece on PR in New York City. Here’s CBS on Los Angeles: www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/n....
1h
The combinatorics raise efficiency questions.
www.voteguy.com
17h
Very excited to see this published!
On simulating STV results
Jack Santucci
Jack Santucci
Jack Santucci
Jack Santucci
Jack Santucci
Jack Santucci
3h
Jack Santucci
www.voteguy.com/2026/06/09/o...
Jack Santucci