//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Former research Officer at @democracyreporting.bsky.social on human rights and the rule of law. Past: Budapest City Hall, @hungarianhelsinki.bsky.social, member of the National Election Commission. Usual disclaimers.
DĂĄniel G. SzabĂł









Loading...
CEE vibes
10mo
University College Dublin has just been announced as the host of the next round of the world's biggest event in public law! The 2026 @icon-s.bsky.social conference will be hosted in Belfield in July 2026 by the UCD Centre for Constitutional Studies led by Prof Carolan & @ucdschooloflaw.bsky.social
‌ It would be unfair to judge the Court solely by the length of these cases, as this is the area where the Court acts decisively and swiftly using interim measures – within days if necessary. Some cases where interim measures were issued within three to six days:
1ïžâƒŁ C-45/87 R, Commission v Ireland; 2ïžâƒŁ C-65/18 P(R)-R, Nexans v Commission; 3ïžâƒŁ C-320/03 R, Commission v Austria; 4ïžâƒŁ C-503/06 R, Commission v Italy; 5ïžâƒŁ C‑78/14 PR, Commission v ANKO AE.
The Court can issue interim measures in infringement cases, an essential tool for avoiding further damage. Current practice forbids the Court from issuing interim measures in preliminary rulings. Therefore, the length of proceedings is more important in preliminary ruling than in infringement cases.
But how fast are these cases? Court statistics show direct actions, including infringement cases as a subcategory, average over 21 months.
đŸ‡ȘđŸ‡ș Infringement proceedings are the primary tool for ensuring that EU Member States comply with EU law. If a country violates Union law, the European Commission—or, rarely, another Member State—can initiate proceedings that may ultimately lead to the Court, which rules on the alleged infringement.
đŸ’„ However, the fastest infringement case was decided within 129 days: C-333/04, Commission v Luxembourg. It was not the most complex case, as Luxembourg did not deny the delayed transposition of the ATEX 153 Directive on workers at risk of explosive atmospheres.
10mo
10mo
An infringement ruling in 129 days – How fast can the Court of Justice of the European Union be?
10mo
10mo
10mo
10mo
10mo
DĂĄniel G. SzabĂł
10mo
I have written about how fast the Court can be in preliminary ruling cases: lnkd.in/dr2sHMB7. Now it is time to analyse its performance in infringement cases.
10mo
DĂĄniel G. SzabĂł
Laurent Pech đŸ‡ș🇩
DĂĄniel G. SzabĂł
DĂĄniel G. SzabĂł
DĂĄniel G. SzabĂł
DĂĄniel G. SzabĂł
DĂĄniel G. SzabĂł
DĂĄniel G. SzabĂł
DĂĄniel G. SzabĂł