My hot take is that not only should we have additional congressional districts, but there should also be psuedodistricts based on things other than geography. Age ranges, gender, income ranges. Each person should have several representatives who each represent different facets of people.
The antipodal auroras!
Airlines should be required to show you a big warning banner when you select flights on Daylight Savings transition days.
Consider this my plea to ping me if I know you and you're going to be there too!
Heartbreaking to hear Sean Eddy (@cryptogenomicon.bsky.social) talk about how arbitrary cuts to his lab's NIH funding have decimated his lab
Sean's lab has built computational tools that enable so much important biology research
also quotes by @jeremymberg.bsky.social
www.npr.org/2026/05/11/n...
Below is the response to my question. The funny part of his response is that my research needed a control arm. My study actually did have a control arm (about 80% of the sample never reported discrimination).
So the answer itself makes me even more confused.
Looking forward to heading off to Cosyne next week, and excited to be part of a two day workshop about connectomics, with day one being about species comparison and day two about using data for constraining models. alleninstitute.github.io/connectomics...
This seems important when thinking about all of the people (especially academics) who stayed in Epstein's orbit. Not that all would agree in the details per se, but that they were not repulsed by deeply held misogyny, expressed in so many different ways
Casey Schneider-Mizell
Casey Schneider-Mizell
Casey Schneider-Mizell
Casey Schneider-Mizell
John Tuthill
In what world is it even helpful to treat this guy like he's not a vicious, churning, petty, malignant, Internet-rotted psychopath
Seeing discussion elsewhere about whether The Rich should be able to access public services for free even tho they're rich, and like, why are we so focused on whether people "deserve" things?
