The trick is to do a theory paper, and then add a bias term that conforms with your desired conclusion but that's totally not biased despite ehat it looks like. And then get mad at your critics when they call you out
Stephen Wild
I think the point where the ideology shows through in the movement is that it's not just "these specific people did bad work" or "this field is bigoted pseudoscience," but "most published findings in all of science are false." Do you really believe that? about your work? your colleagues'? Vaccines?
