//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
International order, ignorance, recognition, Middle East, and other cool stuff karimeltaki.com
Karim El Taki








Loading...
My article on ignorance as constitutive of international order has now found a home in print. I argue that every international order, including the liberal order, rests on systematic practices of ignorance production. Do have a look if you haven’t already! doi.org/10.1093/ia/i...
Whether it's the liberal order, the China order, or the MAGA order, all rest on antiepistemological foundations – systematic practices of producing not-knowing. These range from positive (eg. disinformation) to negative (eg. dismissal) to grey-area forms (eg. silence).
Examining in turn the LIO and human rights, the China order and sovereignty, and MAGA and ethnonationalist civilisationism, I show that proponents of different ordering visions deploy distinct ignorance regimes to preserve coherence in domains central to their legitimacy.
The argument has implications beyond our conceptual understanding of international order(ing). As we hurtle toward the AI age, traditional boundaries between knowledge and ignorance begin to dissolve, transforming the very foundations on which all social orders are built.
Ignorance operates through two key pathways: it enables the intelligibility of ordering norms in the first place and manages the dissonance between proclaimed norms and actual behaviour.