//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Research Fellow at @EUI | Political Scientist | public opinion, attitudes, political socialization, migration, quantitative methods | Author ‘Education and Tolerance’ www.lenkadrazanova.com
Lenka Dražanová







Loading...
We find no equivalent heterogeneity for national pride. This isn't a generalised retreat into collective identity under threat. It's specifically about the EU as shelter.
16d
Implication: external threat can transform the EU from a perceived cultural threat into a necessary geopolitical shelter even for those who most fiercely resisted it. The converts, not the choir, drove the rally.
16d
Lenka Dražanová
Lenka Dražanová
We analyze survey data from 16 EU countries collected 5 weeks after the invasion. Using a causal forest algorithm, we find that exclusive nationalists (those who identify solely with their nation, not Europe) show the strongest association between threat perception and European pride.
It's not just symbolic. The same group shifts toward supporting a common European army. The defenders of national sovereignty moved furthest toward defense integration under threat! The effect is largest in CEE where the threat is most proximate and memories of Soviet domination run deepest.