//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Theoretical evolutionary ecologist. Fond of maths, natural history, and metal music. Kokkonut and PhD student at Uni Mainz, 🇩🇪 Past: BS-MS at IISER Pune + MS thesis at CES, IISc, 🇮🇳 photography: @shikhara_bhat on IG
Shikhara Bhat



Loading...
Though I find cheating/conflict theoretically fun to think about, I strongly resonate with this. To me it feels like a much harder problem to study is the reduction in (eff.) pop. size during an ETI, causing a dramatic increase in the strength of stochasticity in determining evolutionary outcomes.
He also talks about that here link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Polymorphisms are fun to study, here is a butterfly one. Negative freq.dependence works to maintain things but where does it come from? Temporal variation works but not always! @koraklein.bsky.social and @chriswheat.bsky.social looked into this in detail. royalsocietypublishing.org/rstb/article...
11d
19h
1d
Agreed! Every time I watch I see something new.