//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
information science professor (tech ethics + internet stuff) kind of a content creator (elsewhere also @professorcasey) though not influencing anyone to do anything except maybe learn things she/her more: casey.prof
Dr. Casey Fiesler



Loading...
3h
I should note this is an ACM publication. It occurs to me that since the @acm.org digital library seems VERY interested in using AI, perhaps a better use than e.g. paper "podcasts" without author consent would be a system that checks for fabricated citations of their OWN papers before publication.
Dr. Casey Fiesler
So today I stumbled onto a minor publication with a fabricated citation with my name on it. :-\ Opinions on whether I should do anything here? I'm not particularly enthusiastic about the idea, but wonder if at the very least I should email the author.
Ran into another example of the Google AI Overview misinterpreting a search term as a command. :) This is a conference acronym that I saw on a CV and didn't know what it was!
3h
1d
I think that if I were a law professor my exams would be entirely based on controversies sourced from social media. Contract Law currently has the gift of the Bricks & Minifig situation, and for Trademarks recently, in addition to Pattie Gonia vs Patagonia, we've also got "hot girls read"(tm).