//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...


πŸ“’ New publication! πŸ“’ So happy to see this paper finally out @epsrjournal.bsky.social ! Looking at public perceptions of party positions in 29 elections across 20 European countries, I test whether populist radical parties are seen as more moderate when they are part of a government coalition. πŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌ
#OpenAccess from @epsrjournal.bsky.social - Public perceptions of populist radical parties in government: inclusion without moderation? - https://cup.org/4vvvNvV - Sofia Marini #FirstView
Are governing populist radical parties perceived as more moderate❓️ ➑️ My results show that this is not consistently the case. But one goup of voters does perceive them as more moderate: supporters of their mainstream coalition partners - possible enablers of populist radical parties' normalization.
2mo
1mo
2mo
Sofia Marini
Sofia Marini
Cambridge University Press Political Science & IR
πŸ†• Ruling and reigning in? πŸ‘‘ @sofiamarini.bsky.social looks at whether public perceptions of the moderation of #PopulistRadical parties change when in a #GovernmentCoalition and whether this is impacted by #Partisanship, allowing for better understanding of #PartyMainstreaming 🀷
2mo
buff.ly
Public perceptions of populist radical parties in government: inclusion without moderation?
Public perceptions of populist radical parties in government: inclusion without moderation? | European Political Science Review | Cambridge Core
European Political Science Review