I'm doing a bit of light p-hacking in preparation for an NIHR seminar on natural experiments - www.nihr.ac.uk/news/nihr-an... - I asked chatGPT if it could help me do more thorough p-hacking:
"Our primary outcome was XXX scale. Our secondary outcome/sensitivity analysis was a different version of the same scale (eg. dichotomised if the primary outcome is continuous, or vice versa" <- please don't do this!
There are loads of well known assumptions, eg. difference in differences assumes parallel trends, instrumental variables assume there's no other causal paths. These assumptions aren't "violated", they're just more or less valid, or perhaps violated to greater or lesser degrees.
Dan Lewer
Dan Lewer
Dan Lewer
I have no idea why an engine which just guesses plausible sounding words without any real meaning behind them would be popular in management circles.
Reform’s plan to effectively scrap Bradford’s Clean Air Zone is premature and reckless.
Evidence shows the CAZ has improved air quality and cut GP appointments for breathing issues by 600 per month.
Scrapping it now would be a public health mistake our children's generation will pay for.
Both per capita and per unit area-- though I believe the standard per area illustration is that it has 2 popes per square kilometre.
Imagine a world where you had more time than ideas
Violate just sounds so angry
Anna Dixon MP for Shipley
TIL that the NHS Health Research Authority approves **3500** research studies per year! www.hra.nhs.uk/about-us/wha... Thank you HRA
We looked at data on social media and mental health among 12-15-year-olds using data from Born In Bradford.
I wrote a blog reflecting on the correlation between social media use and mental health, and our plans for The IRL Trial later this year.
www.linkedin.com/pulse/from-o...
