We are an independent academic society working to strengthen Danish research at the intersection between Marxism and other traditions of radical scholarship. For news about our annual conference → http://marxistiskestudier.com/
Danish Society for Marxist Studies
Loading...
its not to late to bribe me
Hello from the bunker 👋
How and why do some countries restrict their fossil fuel production?
We explore this in @ripejournal.bsky.social, based on fieldwork in 🇩🇰Denmark, 🇬🇧the UK, 🇨🇴Colombia & 🇨🇷Costa Rica.
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Co-authored with @peternewell.bsky.social, @freddiedaley.bsky.social, and Dani Soto.
Happy abstract selection season! 📄🌿
Today, the organising committe gets together for 5 hours to discuss the abstracts submitted for this year's conference and decide how to put the best programme together.
Curious about our process? Here's a description from last year: bsky.app/profile/dkma...
Excited to report that "Turning the World Upside Down: On Marx, Religion, and Revolution" has been published online. It introduces the forthcoming special (double) issue of Political Theology on "Marx and Revolution" that I co-edited with @s-msorentino.bsky.social. doi.org/10.1080/1462...
Ambitious goals to limit global heating cannot be achieved without significant efforts to cut fossil fuel production. Yet, comparative analysis of the international political economy dynamics that ...
Happy abstract selection season! 📄🌿
Today, the organising committe gets together for 5 hours to discuss the abstracts submitted for this year's conference and decide how to put the best programme together.
Curious about our process? Here's a description from last year: bsky.app/profile/dkma...
@dkmarxsoc.bsky.social @leftofphilosophy.bsky.social HIVE MIND: Has anyone argued that forces & relations are a part of the critique of PE b/c they come from classical PE?... that they are neither materially nor ideologically separated in modes of production for use rather than exchange?
We begin by reading all the abstracts. Everyone on the organizing committee reads every single abstract carefully. Then we vote; we have room for 54 papers in our programme + a buffer of 15% meaning that each committee member can vote for 62 abstracts.
