Live stream of the Thomson v. Ross oral arguments (first AI case to hit appellate review!) in 3rd Cir. will be fascinating to listen. They're still hearing a previous argument right now. Tune in: www.youtube.com/live/ZTOFs1U...
AMEN to this from Re:Create member @publicknowledge.bsky.social - the House made a grave mistake in passing HR 6028 last week. The Senate should play its time-honored role of slowing down this runaway train before somebody gets hurt. publicknowledge.org/public-know...
This is truly wild. The House is about to reorganize the federal copyright and library system without a hearing or robust buy in from almost any impacted group.
#FairUseFriday 🏀 It’s Game 2 of the NBA Finals and fan edits, parodies, and reaction videos are lay-ups thanks to fair use.
California’s AB 412 is a disaster in the making. @eff has the breakdown: www.eff.org/deeplinks/2...
Read the full paper here, so you can stop worrying about *Cox* and realize that its holding has already been the law for 20 years. digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/research/158/
Critics of *Cox* are just following the lower courts in misapplying *Grokster* all these years, ignoring *Grokster's* holding that intent, not knowledge, was the requisite 'culpable' state of mind for secondary liability. This approach reaches back over a century to *Kalem*.
Why are people fetishizing an ambiguous 1970s Second Circuit opinion over plain, simple Supreme Court precedent? Read copyright guru Jonathan Band's breakdown of the real upshot of the recent Cox v. Sony decision in his new white paper at @WCL_PIJIP
✉️ Ahead of the California Senate Committee on Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection hearing of CA AB 412 on June 8, Re:Create submitted a follow up letter to Chairman Cabaldon opposing the bill.