//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Ornithologist-to-be in data science, and vice versa. Postdoc-ing at Imperial College London.
Jingyi Yang









Loading...
Big thanks to the cool team! 👏 Chiti Arvind, @ra-barber.bsky.social, Oscar Johnson, Katie O'Brien; Richard Stanley, Gustavo Bravo, Evan Buck, @sclaramunt.bsky.social, Robb Brumfield, Mike Harvey, Elizabeth Derryberry, and @josephtobias.bsky.social.
... and is consistently constrained by ecological factors such as habitat density and species morphology.
Happy to see my PhD work on birdsong complexity published today! doi.org/10.1098/rspb... 🐦‍⬛ 🎶 ⬇️ Why are some birdsongs simple and some extremely complex? The answer is long thought to be ‘sexual selection favouring complex signals’. But - really?
Testing the evolution of song complexity of >1,200 bird species in 6 social and ecological contexts, we found song complexity does NOT increase with sexual selection (more polygynous mating systems), but instead with higher social competition (more territorial behaviours).
Overall, our findings challenge the common assumption of sexual selection driving signal elaboration, and highlight the combination of social, cultural and ecological factors driving birdsong evolution.