//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Programmer-turned-lawyer, trying to build human(e) futures. Day job: SonarSource. Boards: Creative Commons, OpenET (open water data), CA Housing Defense. Also: 415, dad. Past: Wikipedia, Moz, 305 Also: https://lu.is + https://social.coop/@luis_in_brief
Luis Villa
Loading...
Sort of halfway written already anyway lu.is/2010/08/note...
Lessons of Open Source and Early California Utopian Communes for State Capacity Abundance
Me, 25 years ago: I'm sure LeBron will be good but he can't possibly live up to the hype as a generational basketball talent Me, a few months ago: I'm sure Mamdani will be fine but he can't possibly live up to the hype as a generational political talent
If you're just doing it to avoid the license's requirements, and it isn't a cleanroom, and the underpinning OS is the same (so the structure and organization are likely highly similar), it almost certainly is not transformative and will likely not be a fair use.
I would love Wikipedia, as a movement (with or without @wikimediafoundation.org) to be both carrot and stick in this, giving open models a vector for impact and a source of support.
Sigh, I finally need to write up why this is delusional. TLDR: if you're rewriting the implementation of an API, with an honest-to-god cleanroom (which LLMs are not) *and* a decidedly different underpinning *and* have a good-faith reason to do it, then reuse of the API is probably fair use.
Daphne and @corbinkbarthold.bsky.social and… me?!?!!
8h
Anthropic has been “unnecessarily antagonistic to open weight models [and] open research. [The company] has a specific view of AI, but such a powerful technology will never have its final equilibrium be one of singular control by a private company.” - @natolambert.bsky.social (Only if we act!)
9h
12h