An article about Trump's iconography citing our work in the UAE in the Guardian. A well-researched read! www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
@mcgillpolisci.bsky.social
@cpsjournal.bsky.social
@sarahbush.bsky.social
@laurenrprather.bsky.social
Did an access-to-information system in #Mexico work? Did it become more responsive to public requests for information over time, or did portions of the public become more "expert" in their requests, which in turn ensured responses from the system?
Third, after the first week of the study, we specified that w would sample more low-quality news outlets if we were not getting a sufficient number of false stories after the first two weeks of data collection (see Section K, page 32 of the PAP Appendix from 05–21–2024).
All of the time-stamped versions of our PAP are available under FILES at osf.io/97mnj/?view_... = 3e 89348737ef4911904a4b7b92593902/.
Second, we updated the PAP after conditional acceptance with editorial approval before our fieldwork, as a result of changed conditions related to the ongoing war.
When social science research resumed after the invasion, we resubmitted a modified version of the PAP. We then made three additional sets of updates to the PAP as the project unfolded. First, after each of two rounds of revise & resubmit, we updated the PAP to address requests from peer reviewers
I'd like to reflect on how much certain branches of social science have changed in the last decade: here is the note at the beginning our JEPS pre-registered report -- just out: 1/3
Does anyone have thoughtful approaches to evaluating graduate-level quantitative methods courses in the era of generative AI? I have looked at a lot of folks' syllabi, and they are from a few years ago. It feels like there has been a sea change in the meantime. Thoughts on evaluation?
We submitted our PAP for peer review to JEPS on January 17, 2022, just prior to Russia’s full-scale
invasion of Ukraine. However, we suspended review of the study in the aftermath of the full-scale invasion.