//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
she/her sw infra @ Arcee, opinions my own
aria









Loading...
dramatization of Mythos finally meeting Dario Amodei
i am either cooking or completely out of my mind
so what is the overlap between "my usecase is not ML, math, physics, biology, or cybersecurity" and "I would pay exorbitant per-token rates for a better model" on an enterprise level, who wants to use a model with a silent active-sabotage feature and which is trained to never talk about security?
not about anything in particular but some people on here are a bit too gullible w/r/t new AI papers no, this novel training method didn't make a 3B model better at all tasks than Claude, that paper didn't find a 10x efficiency gain, that new VRAM-saver is slow or degrades performance, etc.
wwdc stands for "what would desus chew"
I guess they're trying not to push their luck with already-tepid non-SF municipalities but I wonder how long it'll be until cities start making infrastructure explicitly more legible to AVs via short-range comms, including IR legibility in standards for signage, etc.