//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Scottish philosopher at the University of Liverpool. Likes to do philosophy by reading about things that are more interesting than philosophy. Some sort of social epistemologist. https://robinmckenna.weebly.com/
Robin McKenna


Loading...
glad to be finished with parental leave because it means I can return to the thing I really love: emailing students to inform them they have been accused of misusing AI in a recent assignment and asking them if they did it or not.
New Substack piece where I argue for the need to give symmetrical explanations of political beliefs--you can't explain the ones you don't like by saying they serve some psychological or social need and the ones you like by saying they just reflect the evidence. open.substack.com/pub/rbnmcken...
3d
“The problem is when you try to have it both ways: the elegance of traditional philosophy directed at real-world problems. If the result is elegant, it won’t help you understand the problem. If it helps you understand the problem, it probably won’t be very elegant.”
17d
26d
Why the study of political belief keeps flattering the people doing it—and how to fix this
open.substack.com