//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
RE: https://front-end.social/@kizu/116766687647230933 Opened an issue about potentially making the `<syntax>` in CSS wider — https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/14065 Right now it is pretty limited, not allowing more complex types or individual instances of `<length>` etc like `4px | […]
5h
front-end.social
Original post on front-end.social
Roma Komarov
@bigandy Yeah, this is not yet possible with the `<syntax>`. And it is something I wanted for a while, and wanted to create an issue about — did just now: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/14065 — upvotes/comments with more concrete use cases are welcome :)
5h
[css-values-5] Should the `<syntax>` support more complex types? · Issue #14065 · w3c/csswg-drafts
Right now, the (https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-5/#typedef-syntax) is pretty limited: […] which resembles a limited form of the CSS value definition syntax used in specifications to de...
github.com
Roma Komarov