my version of this, which is maybe slightly less depressed than Liam's, is that we should expect lots of failures (whether straight up error or meh results) in a functioning research system, and failure states look different in different disciplines
My article on Holly Herndon's A.I. deep fake project Holly+ is now out via the Journal for Popular Music Studies. Free access for the next 30 days via the link below.
online.ucpress.edu/jpms/article...
I'm misaligned and I'm free
yikes, I guess they're just claiming the right to discretion rather than a strict rule, but the denominator situation for some of us—across journals in general, not individual journals—makes this absurd (obligatory exculpatory note that I did 30 peer reviews last year and declined 40 requests)