//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
the other thing i'll note is that it is the district courts, and not SCOTUS, that have been far more effective and reliable in challenging the administration's power-grabs, and with few exceptions, SCOTUS has largely validated all but the most egregious ones.
17h
jamelle
going to channel @nikobowie.bsky.social and Daphna Renan here and note that this piece conflates the court's horizontal review of congressional statutes (highly controversial and politically contested throughout American history) with vertical review of state law and enforcement of federal law.
17h
jamelle
"Court-packing would create a slippery slope to the destruction of judicial review...To the extent Callais is a problem, it can be better addressed by steps such as banning gerrymandering. There are also better remedies for various other shortcomings of the Court," writes @ilyasomin.bsky.social.
18h
To the extent Callais is a problem, it can be better addressed by steps such as banning gerrymandering.
www.lawfaremedia.org
Why Callais Doesn’t Justify Court-Packing
Lawfare