//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
(ICYMI) The law review submission system is bonkers: no peer review, student editors, mass simultaneous submissions. My new paper—the first to model it quantitatively—shows it's deeply inefficient AND biased by institutional prestige: >60% of top placements are misallocated. #AcademicSky #LawSky
1d
Where a legal scholar works shapes publication outcomes nearly as much as what they write. Law reviews, the primary publication market for legal scholarship in the United States, are run by student ed...
journals.plos.org
Inefficiency and inequity of the law review submission system
Chad Topaz Queer DEI Race Traitor