Encouraging research into the quality and credibility of peer review and scientific publication, to establish the evidence base on which scientists can improve the conduct, reporting, and dissemination of scientific research.
peerreviewcongress.org.
Peer Review Congress #PRC11 Coming 2029!
Loading...
Deliberately constrained LLMs can mitigate some of the risks of using the models as a writing aid if ESL authors prompt the tools to interrogate causal boundaries. Click to read examples!
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
@jama.com @metricstanford.bsky.social @bmj.com
@nature.com will now welcome Registered Reports across the fields in which they publish, extending beyond hypotheses-testing studies to include those that eg gather large amounts of data or compare scientific methods
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
New Study - The uptake of open and signed peer reviews, and the 2023 peer review taxonomy remains low - even among EASE members' journals ese.arphahub.com/article/1827...
By 2025, an est. 57% of published journal articles exhibited evidence of #LLM influence, up from 12% in '23, among 7.3M published in 2020–25 by 4 major publishers www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
@pnas.org @kylesiler.bsky.social
An #AI led analysis of publicly available #PeerReview reports for #NatureCommunications papers links requests for major revisions with papers that end up having high impact.
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
@nature.com @marilenharo.bsky.social
Current #AI tools for writing scientific reviews are far from ready for mainstream adoption, and the assumption that machines can replace humans on all methodological tasks is flawed
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
@nature.com @cochrane.org
If writing is a core practice through which scientists think, signal quality, & make knowledge accountable, letting #AI do the writing risks eroding #authorship and the epistemic foundations of science itself
journals.plos.org/plosbiology/...
@plos.org
Peer Review Congress #PRC11 Coming 2029!
Nature spoke to a variety of scientists, from highly adept coders to complete beginners, who are using AI to stretch the limits of the coding they can do. Many use AI-assisted coding in their work, and some are intentionally testing its limits. #Academicsky 🧪
EASE India webinar 'Redefining Manuscript Editorial Expertise in 2026' coming up on Thursday, 18 June.
The focus of this session with Hema Thakur will be on where editors add value in the AI landscape and why it matters.
This free webinar will be conducted in English.
bit.ly/IndiaWebinar...
Peer Review Congress #PRC11 Coming 2029!
The Rise of China's Scholarly Publishing System Part 1: China's Journal Ecosystem Is Accelerating - The Scholarly Kitchen
Peer Review Congress #PRC11 Coming 2029!
Peer Review Congress #PRC11 Coming 2029!
Peer Review Congress #PRC11 Coming 2029!
Peer Review Congress #PRC11 Coming 2029!
Mario Malički
Nature Portfolio
European Association of Science Editors
Society for Scholarly Publishing
Using AI coding tools can speed up your work, but there are plenty of pitfalls.
This Viewpoint explores whether the utility artificial intelligence (AI) tools for non-native English researchers may compromise the epistemic accuracy of scientific writing.
jamanetwork.com
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly changing academic research, raising questions
of who is adopting these tools and under what conditions. Th...
The use of large language models is rapidly transforming the scientific writing process, making it quicker and easier to write research papers. However, this Perspective urges caution when using such ...
Registered Reports improve the credibility of scientific claims by rewarding big questions, sound methods and solid analyses. They need to become a standard tool in research.
China is no longer simply a major contributor to global research output; it is increasingly becoming a key force shaping the future of scholarly publishing. Understanding what is actually happening, and why, is the necessary first step before considering how publishers should respond.
