//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...









Loading...
Couldn't have done this without great data (@ipums.bsky.social) and great co-authors (@rebeccasear.bsky.social, @anthrolog.bsky.social)!
1mo
Come join our workshop on excess mortality methodology! It will be two great days of expert talks, discussion groups, and me revealing the results of our many analyst project! 40+ teams have signed up to estimate 1918 pandemic deaths with the method of their choice -- results should be fascinating!
Like the authors talk about, this also happened during the 1918 flu, with the 1919 cohort being poorer from birth than (at least in the US). As much as I wish differently, this casts doubt on the whole premise of cohort discontinuity studies of the effects of pandemics! (1/2)
4mo
And for all the 1918 flu cohort studies that compare 1919 to all surrounding cohorts, including 1920, the water is doubly muddied: fertility patterns make it look like any compositional changes persisted into 1920, causing bias in the opposite direction too (2/2) doi.org/10.1080/0032...
5mo
5mo
Hampton Gaddy
Hampton Gaddy
Hampton Gaddy
Hampton Gaddy
In 1919–20, the European countries that were neutral in the First World War saw a small baby bust followed by a small baby boom. The sparse literature on this topic attributes the 1919 bust to indi...
doi.org
Did the 1918 influenza pandemic cause a 1920 baby boom? Demographic evidence from neutral Europe
Glad to see more demographers pushing back against the low fertility panic and in non-demographic outlets, where they might reach broader audiences. 1/ www.nature.com/articles/s41...
3mo
New research from a team I was part of w Lauren Steele, @andreatilstra.bsky.social, & other virologists & demographers: Research on flu pandemics has been heavily shaped by 1) the 1918 flu & 2) US-specific data for other pandemics. Turns out that way understates the variety of age patterns of risk!
25d
Nature Human Behaviour - Low fertility may persist and could be good for the economy
www.nature.com
Low fertility may persist and could be good for the economy - Nature Human Behaviour
AbstractBackground. Understanding age-specific mortality patterns across historic influenza pandemics is crucial for future pandemic preparedness. Prior re
Age-specific mortality patterns across influenza pandemics: evidence from all-cause mortality data across multiple populations
academic.oup.com
📣 Call for papers: We are inviting you to submit contributions to a Special Collection on the Socioeconomic Inequalities in Mortality in the Long-Run, organized by K. Thompson, T. Riswick & S. Clouston. Submissions to this collection are possible from January 28, 2026 until June 28, 2026. (1/2)
4mo
New paper finally published! Using data on 78 million births from 15 countries, we found that babies conceived during the COVID-19 pandemic have a different parental socioeconomic composition than expected had the pandemic not occurred. doi.org/10.1038/s414... @natcomms.nature.com @helsinki.fi
5mo
My research means I spend a lot of timing thinking about the conditions under which people stop trying to preserve their health and well-being. Why do people continue to smoke even when they know the risks of cancer? Why do people refuse to wear a seatbelt or a helmet when they know the risks?
4mo
IPUMS International Student Award is a tie! * @hggaddy.bsky.social for "High rates of polygyny do not lock large proportions of men out of the marriage market" (doi.org/10.1073/pnas...).
1mo