This is a common reply to concerns about GenAI research as if it were just another computational tool that saves us times from tedious tasks and whose accuracy can be rigorously quantified.
It is not.
GenAI research poses at least 2 serious problems... /n
Jeremy Van Cleve
I keep coming back to Kevin Bryan's point: "I get the desire for artisanal, hand-crafted research, with the matrices hand-inverted. But our job is to move the frontier of knowledge, not self-actualization."
I personally don't care if something is done by humans or AI, I want it to be accurate.
