Update: I can take work and I want work
Job: story artist/lead/directing
Currently: ???
Former clients: World Cup, Netflix, Feed Me Light
Preference: teen/adult action comedy
Focus: budget-friendly, quick
Stuff: here, Cara.app/chancesecond, insta chance_second
#lookingforworkanimation
German court rules that Google is liable for false statements made in Search's AI Overviews
(via The Decoder)
IT IS NOT GOOSE’S, THE ANIMATORS’, OR THE CAST’S FAULT BTW
This is solely on the administrative side so I better not fucking see any of you trogs harassing them.
The takeaway is twofold:
1. Be wary of using AI image detection as the primary basis in labeling someone a secret prompter.
2. Be aware that adding certain elements to your own work may trigger false positives, even when the element itself is 100% legitimate.
I can say with certainty that OpenAI cannot afford this. To do this before IPO is like putting a gun to your head and trying to ransom someone. Customers must be flipping their shit at their current token bills. And according to SemiAnalysis OpenAI lets you burn $14k of tokens on a $200 a month plan
Quick PSA: AI Image Detectors
TL;DR: Take them with a grain of salt.
Recently, I saw a discussion about a couple of artists being outed as prompters, and in one instance an AI detection tool was used. This got me thinking, so I ran my newest drawing through one to see what would happen.
Hmmm...