//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...









Loading...
Behavioral work showed both models uniquely explain human social judgments - suggesting people use both strategies. But how are these computations organized in the brain?
This challenges a strict division-of-labor story for the social brain. Both "social perception" and "mentalizing" regions carry out a combination of relational bottom-up and higher-order inferential computations!
To study this, we recently developed two computational models: 🔵 A bottom-up GNN that makes social inferences by relationally structuring visual input 🔴 A generative inverse-planning model that infers agents' goals, beliefs, and relationships by simulating what rational agents would do
Previous work suggests a *functional hierarchy*: pSTS extracts coarse interaction structure, TPJ performs higher-order mental state inferences. This suggests a computational-neural mapping: pSTS ➡ 🔵 bottom-up relational computations TPJ ➡ 🔴 inverse-planning computations
In everyday life, we can effortlessly tell if people are interacting - and whether they're being friendly or fighting. We know “social perception” and “mentalizing” regions are involved (like pSTS and TPJ respectively), but what computations are they actually performing?
3mo
3mo
3mo
3mo
3mo
We compared both models to fMRI responses while participants watched animated social interactions Surprising result: BOTH models explained neural responses in BOTH pSTS and TPJ, even after controlling for the variance explained by the other model. ⇒Computations not strictly segregated by region.
Excited to share new work on how the brain makes social inferences from visual input! 🧠👯‍♂️ (With @lisik.bsky.social , @shariliu.bsky.social, @tianminshu.bsky.social , and Minjae Kim!) www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
Heading to #vss2026? Check out the presentations from our lab @vssmtg.bsky.social
3mo
3mo
Excited to be in Amsterdam for #CCN2025! If you're here, check out the presentations from our lab 👇@qinwenshuo.bsky.social @ziruichen.bsky.social @manasimalik.bsky.social @cogcompneuro.bsky.social
Manasi Malik
Manasi Malik
The department of Cognitive Science @jhu.edu is seeking motivated students interested in joining our interdisciplinary PhD program! Applications due 1 Dec Our PhD students also run an application mentoring program for prospective students. Mentoring requests due November 15. tinyurl.com/2nrn4jf9
Manasi Malik
28d
Manasi Malik
Manasi Malik
10mo
7mo
Manasi Malik
Manasi Malik
JHU Cognitive Science
Leyla Isik
Leyla Isik