//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
AI research scientist at Google Deepmind, Zürich
Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin









Loading...
Question: what if we use infinite compute? Will the gap vanish? We did scaling analysis and found that RINS improves both the asymptotic performance limit (so the gap actually increases, not vanishes) and improves convergence speed (scaling exponent).
Besides, we also introduce *stochastic* RINS where we select the number of recursion rounds from a binomial distribution. This *improves* performance in SigLIP (despite also *saving* training flops). But in LM, there is a tradeoff between flexibility and maximum performance gain.
Feb 12, 2025
Feb 12, 2025
Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin
Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin
🔥Excited to introduce RINS - a technique that boosts model performance by recursively applying early layers during inference without increasing model size or training compute flops! Not only does it significantly improve LMs, but also multimodal systems like SigLIP. (1/N)
To repeat, we train RINS on less data to match the same compute flops, which is why this is a stronger result than “sample efficiency”, and one should not just expect it to work. E.g. it does NOT help in image classification but RINS works in language and multimodal. Why? (3/n)🤔
Feb 12, 2025