//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
In this @slate.com op-ed, @drchikaokafor.bsky.social (Northwestern University) argues that the Supreme Court's reasoning behind the Louisiana v. Callais decision rests on the faulty premise that colorblind rules produce fairer outcomes. Learn more: slate.com/news-and-pol...
15d
The math will not change. The only question is whether our laws will reckon with it.
Sam Alito’s Math on “Colorblindness” Doesn’t Check Out
slate.com
Scholars Strategy Network