Law professor
Statutory interpretation, legislation, federal courts, administrative law
Research: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=648978
Posts do not speak for my employer
Loading...
Add judicial estoppel to the long list of doctrines Justice Thomas is interested in revisiting. See today’s concurrence here:
#SCOTUS
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...
For those interested in statutory interpretation (who isn’t), there is a long exchange on the use of legislative history in one of today’s #SCOTUS opinions.
The cocktail party quip and Holy Trinity are both mentioned.
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...
In a low-profile ruling Thursday, ACB & KBJ went head-to-head over the role of Congress in their decisionmaking
The squabble between the court’s two junior members highlighted a larger conflict on the bench about how the justices referee policy disputes
It's an exciting day TODAY at W&M! The third hour of the NBC program featured guest co-host Patton Oswalt ’91, D.A. ’23, President Katherine A. Rowe and several members of the Class of 2026.
The Judgment Fund, the Miscellaneous Receipts Act, no part of the fiscal constitution is too obscure to be corrupted.
My library’s copy just arrived. I will turn first to the chapter on the history of equitable interpretation of statutes.
Some personal news I’m proud to share:
A useful CRS report for those interested in the Judgment Fund and potential ways Congress could restrict it.
www.congress.gov/crs-product/...
The claimed federal issues are:
(1) interpretation of state law relied on misunderstanding of federal meaning of “election”; and
(2) Moore v. Harper - departure from ordinary bounds of review.
A great and well-deserved honor for my William & Mary colleague Alli Larsen.
law.wm.edu/news/stories...
Aaron Bruhl
Aaron Bruhl
The 2026 McGlothlin Award for Exceptional Teaching has been granted to Professor Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl of William & Mary Law School and to Professor Dawn Edmiston of the Raymond A. Mason School of Bus...
